IThe URL for this article is http://www.icdsm.com/milosevic/kosovo.htm

Send this article to a friend!

www.icdsm.com
International Committee to Defend Slobodan Milosevic

=======================================
Milosevich's Speech at Kosovo Field in 1989
and a letter to the 'Independent' from Jared Israel
=======================================


Milosevich's Speech
Kosovo Field, 1989

Introduction and Historical Note by Jared Israel
(Mr. Israel's text was written April, 1999)

Introduction

It is impossible for a society to engage in genocide unless the population is won to racism because racism is not inborn, not natural. For racism to take root, the culture and the political leadership have to support racism in deeds -- and also in words.

We are told this has happened in Serbia. We are told that Slobodan Milosevich and other Serbian leaders have indoctrinated the Serbian people in hatred for non-Serbs, especially ethnic Albanians in Kosovo province. We are told that Milosevich launched this racist campaign in a speech at Kosovo Field in 1989.

The charge against Milosevich, that he preaches race hate, is significant because it supports the charge against the Serbian people - that they have been won to racism and therefore practice genocide. Because many Americans believe these charges they are disposed to believe there must be some truth to the avalanche of pro-war propaganda demonizing the Serbs.

So. It is important to know exactly what Milosevich said in his speech at Kosovo Field. Yet nowhere do any of those who attack Milosevich's speech quote his words. Why not?

Greg Elich, a researcher, unearthed a U.S. government transcript of the Kosovo Field speech. Please read it and ask: is it a racist diatribe, reminiscent of Hitler? Or is it something quite different, something really quite different indeed?

* * * * * * *

[Speech by Slobodan Milosevich, delivered to an estimated 1 million people at the central celebration marking the 600th anniversary of the Battle of Kosovo, held at Gazimestan on 28 June, 1989. Compiled by the National Technical Information Service of the US Department of Commerce.]

By the force of social circumstances this great 600th anniversary of the Battle of Kosovo is taking place in a year in which Serbia, after many years, after many decades, has regained its state, national, and spiritual integrity. Therefore, it is not difficult for us to answer today the old question: how are we going to face Milos [Milos Obilic, legendary hero of the Battle of Kosovo]. Through the play of history and life, it seems as if Serbia has, precisely in this year, in 1989, regained its state and its dignity and thus has celebrated an event of the distant past which has a great historical and symbolic significance for its future.

Serbian Character -- Liberational

Today, it is difficult to say what is the historical truth about the Battle of Kosovo and what is legend. Today this is no longer important. Oppressed by pain and filled with hope, the people used to remember and to forget, as, after all, all people in the world do, and it was ashamed of treachery and glorified heroism. Therefore it is difficult to say today whether the Battle of Kosovo was a defeat or a victory for the Serbian people, whether thanks to it we fell into slavery or we survived in this slavery. The answers to those questions will be constantly sought by science and the people. What has been certain through all the centuries until our time today is that disharmony struck Kosovo 600 years ago. If we lost the battle, then this was not only the result of social superiority and the armed advantage of the Ottoman Empire but also of the tragic disunity in the leadership of the Serbian state at that time. In that distant 1389, the Ottoman Empire was not only stronger than that of the Serbs but it was also more fortunate than the Serbian kingdom.

The lack of unity and betrayal in Kosovo will continue to follow the Serbian people like an evil fate through the whole of its history. Even in the last war, this lack of unity and betrayal led the Serbian people and Serbia into agony, the consequences of which in the historical and moral sense exceeded fascist aggression.

Even later, when a socialist Yugoslavia was set up, in this new state the Serbian leadership remained divided, prone to compromise to the detriment of its own people. The concessions that many Serbian leaders made at the expense of their people could not be accepted historically and ethically by any nation in the world, especially because the Serbs have never in the whole of their history conquered and exploited others. Their national and historical being has been liberational throughout the whole of history and through two world wars, as it is today. They liberated themselves and when they could they also helped others to liberate themselves. The fact that in this region they are a major nation is not a Serbian sin or shame; this is an advantage which they have not used against others, but I must say that here, in this big, legendary field of Kosovo, the Serbs have not used the advantage of being great for their own benefit either.

Thanks to their leaders and politicians and their vassal mentality they felt guilty before themselves and others. This situation lasted for decades, it lasted for years and here we are now at the field of Kosovo to say that this is no longer the case.

Unity Will Make Prosperity Possible

Disunity among Serb officials made Serbia lag behind and their inferiority humiliated Serbia. Therefore, no place in Serbia is better suited for saying this than the field of Kosovo and no place in Serbia is better suited than the field of Kosovo for saying that unity in Serbia will bring prosperity to the Serbian people in Serbia and each one of its citizens, irrespective of his national or religious affiliation.

Serbia of today is united and equal to other republics and prepared to do everything to improve its financial and social position and that of all its citizens. If there is unity, cooperation, and seriousness, it will succeed in doing so. This is why the optimism that is now present in Serbia to a considerable extent regarding the future days is realistic, also because it is based on freedom, which makes it possible for all people to express their positive, creative and humane abilities aimed at furthering social and personal life.

Serbia has never had only Serbs living in it. Today, more than in the past, members of other peoples and nationalities also live in it. This is not a disadvantage for Serbia. I am truly convinced that it is its advantage. National composition of almost all countries in the world today, particularly developed ones, has also been changing in this direction. Citizens of different nationalities, religions, and races have been living together more and more frequently and more and more successfully.

Socialism in particular, being a progressive and just democratic society, should not allow people to be divided in the national and religious respect. The only differences one can and should allow in socialism are between hard working people and idlers and between honest people and dishonest people. Therefore, all people in Serbia who live from their own work, honestly, respecting other people and other nations, are in their own republic.

Dramatic National Divisions

After all, our entire country should be set up on the basis of such principles. Yugoslavia is a multinational community and it can survive only under the conditions of full equality for all nations that live in it.

The crisis that hit Yugoslavia has brought about national divisions, but also social, cultural, religious and many other less important ones. Among all these divisions, nationalist ones have shown themselves to be the most dramatic. Resolving them will make it easier to remove other divisions and mitigate the consequences they have created.

For as long as multinational communities have existed, their weak point has always been the relations between different nations. The threat is that the question of one nation being endangered by the others can be posed one day -- and this can then start a wave of suspicions, accusations, and intolerance, a wave that invariably grows and is difficult to stop. This threat has been hanging like a sword over our heads all the time. Internal and external enemies of multi-national communities are aware of this and therefore they organize their activity against multinational societies mostly by fomenting national conflicts. At this moment, we in Yugoslavia are behaving as if we have never had such an experience and as if in our recent and distant past we have never experienced the worst tragedy of national conflicts that a society can experience and still survive.

Equal and harmonious relations among Yugoslav peoples are a necessary condition for the existence of Yugoslavia and for it to find its way out of the crisis and, in particular, they are a necessary condition for its economic and social prosperity. In this respect Yugoslavia does not stand out from the social milieu of the contemporary, particularly the developed, world. This world is more and more marked by national tolerance, national cooperation, and even national equality. The modern economic and technological, as well as political and cultural development, has guided various peoples toward each other, has made them interdependent and increasingly has made them equal as well [medjusobno ravnopravni]. Equal and united
people can above all become a part of the civilization toward which mankind is moving. If we cannot be at the head of the column leading to such a civilization, there is certainly no need for us to be at is tail.

At the time when this famous historical battle was fought in Kosovo, the people were looking at the stars, expecting aid from them. Now, 6 centuries later, they are looking at the stars again, waiting to conquer them. On the first occasion, they could allow themselves to be disunited and to have hatred and treason because they lived in smaller, weakly interlinked worlds. Now, as people on this planet, they cannot conquer even their own planet if they are not united, let alone other planets, unless they live in mutual harmony and solidarity.

Therefore, words devoted to unity, solidarity, and cooperation among people have no greater significance anywhere on the soil of our motherland than they have here in the field of Kosovo, which is a symbol of disunity and treason.

In the memory of the Serbian people, this disunity was decisive in causing the loss of the battle and in bringing about the fate which Serbia suffered for a full 6 centuries.

Even if it were not so, from a historical point of view, it remains certain that the people regarded disunity as its greatest disaster. Therefore it is the obligation of the people to remove disunity, so that they may protect themselves from defeats, failures, and stagnation in the future.

Unity brings Back Dignity

This year, the Serbian people became aware of the necessity of their mutual harmony as the indispensable condition for their present life and further development.

I am convinced that this awareness of harmony and unity will make it possible for Serbia not only to function as a state but to function as a successful state. Therefore I think that it makes sense to say this here in Kosovo, where that disunity once upon a time tragically pushed back Serbia for centuries and endangered it, and where renewed unity may advance it and may return dignity to it. Such an awareness about mutual relations constitutes an elementary necessity for Yugoslavia, too, for its fate is in the joined hands of all its peoples. The Kosovo heroism has been inspiring our creativity for 6 centuries, and has been feeding our pride and does not allow us to forget that at one time we were an army great, brave, and proud, one of the few that remained undefeated when losing.

Six centuries later, now, we are being again engaged in battles and are facing battles. They are not armed battles, although such things cannot be excluded yet. However, regardless of what kind of battles they are, they cannot be won without resolve, bravery, and sacrifice, without the noble qualities that were present here in the field of Kosovo in the days past. Our chief battle now concerns implementing the economic, political, cultural, and general social prosperity, finding a quicker and more successful approach to a civilization in which people will live in the 21st century. For this battle, we certainly need heroism, of course of a somewhat different kind, but that courage without which nothing serious and great can be achieved remains unchanged and remains urgently necessary.

Six centuries ago, Serbia heroically defended itself in the field of Kosovo, but it also defended Europe. Serbia was at that time the bastion that defended the European culture, religion, and European society in general. Therefore today it appears not only unjust but even unhistorical and completely absurd to talk about Serbia's belonging to Europe. Serbia has been a part of Europe incessantly, now just as much as it was in the past, of course, in its own way, but in a way that in the historical sense never deprived it of dignity. In this spirit we now endeavor to build a society, rich and democratic, and thus to contribute to the prosperity of this beautiful country, this unjustly suffering country, but also to contribute to the efforts of all the progressive people of our age that they make for a better and happier world.

Let the memory of Kosovo heroism live forever!

Long live Serbia!

Long live Yugoslavia!

Long live peace and brotherhood among peoples!

* * * * * * * *

Historical note
by Jared Israel

This speech came at the culmination of a struggle in which millions of Serbs, Gypsies, Hungarians, Jews, Turks and other ethnic groups opposed the racist policies of the secessionist movement among Kosovo Albanians. For years the fascistic secessionists had dominated Kosovo; their persecution of other ethnic groups, especially Serbs and Romas ("Gypsies") is well documented; so is the multi-ethnic character of the mass movement against that persecution.

What is so amazing about Milosevich's speech is he does not use the occasion of addressing a million people in Kosovo to advance a narrow ethnic agenda. He does not at any point attack ethnic Albanians. Instead he calls for reconciliation and mutual respect, citing the presence of different ethnic groups as Serbia's strength. Of course the speech does celebrate the existence of Serbia as a nation. But don't all national leaders celebrate the existence of their nations? The important point is he celebrates it as a multi-ethnic entity and that he never calls for the expansion of Serbian territory. Indeed, his point about the Kosovo Field battle of 1389 is that the Serbian army was morally superior and therefore victorious even in defeat, a rather sophisticated if melancholy viewpoint definitely over the head of the one-time Rhodes Scholar who is now Hustler-in-Chief of our own poor (though rich and powerful) country.

Below is a letter I just sent the Independent, a British paper:

Dear editor:

In his May 3 [1999] letter Stuart Russell presents NATO's claims of massive Serbian atrocities as proven and asserts government complicity because "We have yet to hear any mention of Milosevich condemning, or even distancing himself from the atrocities."

Milosevich told UPI on April 30th [1999]:

"We are not angels. Nor are we the devils you have made us out to be. Our regular forces are highly disciplined. The paramilitary irregular forces are a different story. Bad things happened... We have arrested those irregular self-appointed leaders. Some have already been tried and sentenced to 20 years in prison."
Proving innocence is harder than charging guilt. But consider: NATO and the media have been exposed over 50 times lying and fabricating evidence (E.g., Jamie Rubin said on 3/30 that Pristina Stadium was being used to intern tens of thousands; but when Agence France Presse reported the stadium had been unused in weeks, Rubin simply denied having made the charge; NATO presented a tape of a pilot bombing a refugee caravan only later to explain it was AN EXAMPLE of such a tape (?!), Agence France Presse reported (4/24) an Amsterdam reconnaissance expert's finding that NATO had doctored "mass grave" pictures, etc., etc.)

If the prosecution is caught systematically lying and creating evidence, shouldn't it be the one on trial?

Jared Israel

IThe URL for this article is http://www.icdsm.com/milosevic/kosovo.htm

International Committee to Defend Slobodan Milosevic

www.icdsm.com